Tracking-by-Registration: A Robust Approach for Optical Tracking System in Surgical Navigation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Optical tracking system (OTS) is an important part of surgical navigation and has been widely employed in clinical practice due to high accuracy and reliability. However, current OTS has a common occlusion of line-of-sight problem. To address the partial occlusion problem of target, we propose a tracking-by-registration (TbR) method based on a novel grid-based target (GT) and a corresponding target generation algorithm (TGA). Based on the word probability and target distance metric, TGA generates a set of GTs to minimize ambiguity. Utilizing the prior information of model sets, the identification of different targets is realized during tracking. An IR marker’s performance is theoretically evaluated and the maximum angles within the feasible range are validated. Both simulations and experiments have been carried out to validate the feasibility and performance of the proposed approach. The results indicate that the proposed approach has satisfactory performance to track the occluded target and provides a new option for optical tracking technologies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it