Resource-Efficient Neural Network Architectures for Classifying Nerve Cuff Recordings on Implantable Devices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Closed-loop functional electrical stimulation can use recorded nerve signals to create implantable systems that make decisions regarding nerve stimulation in real-time. Previous work demonstrated convolutional neural network (CNN) discrimination of activity from different neural pathways recorded by a high-density multi-contact nerve cuff electrode, achieving state-of-the-art performance but requiring too much data storage and power for a practical implementation on surgically implanted hardware. OBJECTIVE: To reduce resource utilization for an implantable implementation, with minimal performance loss for CNNs that can discriminate between neural pathways in multi-contact cuff electrode recordings. METHODS: Neural networks (NNs) were evaluated using rat sciatic nerve recordings previously collected using 56-channel cuff electrodes to capture spatiotemporal neural activity patterns. NNs were trained to classify individual, natural compound action potentials (nCAPs) elicited by sensory stimuli. Three architectures were explored: the previously reported ESCAPE-NET, a fully convolutional network, and a recurrent neural network. Variations of each architecture were evaluated based on F1-score, number of weights, and floating-point operations (FLOPs). RESULTS: NNs were identified that, when compared to ESCAPE-NET, require 1,132-1,787x fewer weights, 389-995x less memory, and 6-11,073x fewer FLOPs, while maintaining macro F1-scores of 0.70-0.71 compared to a baseline of 0.75. Memory requirements range from 22.69 KB to 58.11 KB, falling within on-chip memory sizes from published deep learning accelerators fabricated in ASIC technology. CONCLUSION: Reduced versions of ESCAPE-NET require significantly fewer resources without significant accuracy loss, thus can be more easily incorporated into a surgically implantable device that performs closed-loop responsive neural stimulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".