MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386474030 · doi:10.33921/vlqc3871

The role of the imposture syndrome and the anticipations of sixth graders in their adaptation to the beginning of secondary school

2021· article· en· W4386474030 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Andrée-Ann Labranche, Thérèse Bouffard, Carole Vezeau

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Interpersonal Relations Intergroup Relations and Identity · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
Canadian institutionsCegep regional de LanaudiereUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeelingPsychologyAdaptation (eye)Developmental psychologyCognitionSecondary educationSocial psychologyMathematics education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For many students, the transition from elementary to secondary school is a time of concern and hope for their functioning in their future environment. Because of the uncertainties about the demands of the future environment, it also coincides with the emergence of impostorism for some. This study examined 578 students (306 girls) who responded to questionnaires in Grade 6 and Secondary 1 to determine the relationship between their feelings of impostorism and their expectations of secondary school. It also examined whether the feeling of impostorism in grade 6 contributed to their adjustment to secondary school. The results show a positive relationship between impostorism and negative expectations (r=0.39), but no relationship with positive expectations. Students' impostorism is significantly related to indicators of their motivational, emotional and cognitive adjustment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Interpersonal Relations Intergroup Relations and IdentitySame topicPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesFrench-language works237,207