Demo: Leveraging Edge Intelligence for Affective Communication over URLLC
Bibliographic record
Abstract
IoT systems are advancing to enable higher levels of engagement and omnipresence. A critical yet uncharted domain lies in communicating affect across participants, especially in medical settings where emotions and expressions are pivotal, and eXtended Reality (XR) systems that rely on immersive virtualization of the participating parties. However, IoT systems seldom have the bandwidth or reliability to enable such services. In this demo, we present an experiment that leverages Edge Intelligence and Artificial Intelligence to extract and encode emotions at one edge, and communicate a low-footprint encapsulation of such emotions at the other edge. The proposed architecture is designed to reduce overall traffic and build on low-power video and display equipment, to realize Affective Semantic Communication (AffSeC). This demonstration shall represent AffSeC in a medical setting, where a patient interacts with a physician over a low-BW E2E route. The proposed scheme will be contrasted to standard video compression to demonstrate the efficacy and promise of this model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".