MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386476926 · doi:10.1080/19648189.2023.2254376

Transferring vision-based data to discontinuum analysis for the assessment of URM walls

2023· article· en· W4386476926 on OpenAlexafffund
Peter Griesbach, R. Wilson, Berk Karakuş, Bora Pulatsu

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Environmental and Civil engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMasonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceGeologyEngineeringArtificial intelligenceForensic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research presents a new workflow to assess unreinforced masonry (URM) walls based on vision-based data. The morphological features (i.e. brick pattern) of URM walls are obtained through high-resolution orthogonal images and then imported into a three-dimensional discrete element code (3DEC) to perform structural analysis via a semi-automatic procedure. URM walls are represented using rigid blocks that can mechanically interact along their boundaries. The mechanical interaction is simulated based on the point-contact hypothesis considering spring frictional elements. Once the numerical approach is validated using the results available in the literature, the proposed data-driven modelling strategy is applied to different URM wall cross-sections, with or without openings. The results show that the adopted semi-automatic workflow can be a fast and robust solution to simulate the structural behaviour of existing URM buildings by considering their construction techniques efficiently.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Environmental and Civil engineeringSame topicMasonry and Concrete Structural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207