MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386478953 · doi:10.4000/cve.13489

Martin A. Danahay. Gender at Work in Victorian Culture : Literature, Art and Masculinity. The Nineteenth Century Series

2006· article· fr· W4386478953 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Annie Escuret

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers victoriens et édouardiens · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyLiteratureHistoryArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Martin A. Danahay est Professeur à l’université de Brock (Canada). Le volume porte sur les connotations idéologiques et culturelles du travail à l’époque victorienne puisqu’on l’associait à la masculinité tandis que les activités intellectuelles et artistiques étaient plutôt considérées comme relevant du domaine des femmes. On faisait donc rimer labeur et sueur. L’auteur commence par rappeler que, sur les panneaux qu’il voyait enfant au bord des routes (« Caution : Men at Work »), figurait t...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.223
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers victoriens et édouardiensSame topicAcademic and Historical Perspectives in PsychologyFrench-language works237,207