International Status in the Shadow of Empire: Nauru and the Histories of International Law by Cait Storr
Bibliographic record
Abstract
IN 2007, THE PARLIAMENT OF NAURU, a (formerly) phosphorus-rich island nation located in the southwest of the Pacific Ocean, was presented with a report completed by its appointed Constitutional Review Commission that sought to explain, in short, “‘[w]hat’…had gone ‘wrong’ with the Republic of Nauru.” The Commission, funded by the United Nations Development Programme, produced a scathing report, which concluded that Nauru was in dire need of constitutional reform and that the nation needed to better its institutions, laws, and training of leaders in the business of governance in order to address thefailures of the state. The government initiated a referendum vote to address the gaps identified in the 2007 report. In 2010, that vote was held: The referendum campaign failed, with 67 per cent of the population of Nauru voting no and 33 per cent voting yes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.027 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".