Défis et obstacles au repérage et à l’intervention en matière de violence conjugale lors de la période périnatale : principaux constats issus de l’expérience professionnelle auprès des familles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La violence conjugale lors de la période périnatale (VCPP) est une préoccupation sociale et de santé importante. Afin de documenter les pratiques de repérage et d’intervention en VCPP au Québec, 29 intervenant·es de différents milieux ont participé à des groupes de discussion focalisés réalisés entre les mois de décembre 2019 et mars 2020. Trois thèmes centraux ont été dégagés : 1) la présence de pratiques de repérage très variables; 2) la mécompréhension et la banalisation de la VCPP ainsi que des écarts d’analyse et de pratiques entre les professionnel·les; et finalement 3) les barrières structurelles comme frein important dans le repérage et l’intervention en VCPP. Ces résultats pourront guider l’amélioration des services en VCPP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".