MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4386494136 · doi:10.37099/mtu.dc.etdr/1614

SILVICULTURE, SEEDS, AND DEER: ASSESSING GROUND-LAYER DIVERSITY ALONG EXPERIMENTAL DISTURBANCE GRADIENTS IN A MANAGED NORTHERN HARDWOOD FOREST

2023· dissertation· en· W4386494136 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Claudia I. Bartlick

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest Management and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpecies richnessUnderstorySilvicultureEcologyCanopyRegeneration (biology)Species diversityDisturbance (geology)Intermediate Disturbance HypothesisHardwoodEnvironmental scienceForestryAgroforestryBiologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this dissertation research is to examine drivers of ground-layer diversity along experimental gradients of overstory and understory disturbance in a managed northern hardwood forest. My research was conducted at the Northern Hardwood Silviculture Experiment to Enhance Diversity (NHSEED) project site in Alberta, Michigan. In the first chapter, I examine the effect of canopy removal, soil disturbance, deer exclusion, and manual seed addition on the diversity, composition, and heterogeneity of tree regeneration. The primary conclusion drawn from this chapter is that although greater canopy openness and soil disturbance may enhance species richness and heterogeneity, the highest species richness across all treatment combinations was achieved through a combination of deer exclusion and seed addition. Importantly, deer exclusion alone did not enhance richness or compositional heterogeneity, underlining the bottleneck effect of limited propagule availability. Manual seed addition successfully altered species composition, increasing species richness and compositional heterogeneity. Addressing propagule limitation and deer browse is essential for enhancing tree species diversity alongside selecting appropriate regeneration and site preparation methods. In the second chapter, I explore whether the implementation of artificial tip-up mounds could improve tree regeneration diversity in managed northern hardwood forests. The results demonstrated that these mounds can create distinct seedling communities and reduce the dominance of competitive maple regeneration in forests regenerated with selection systems. Implementing artificial tip-up mounds may be beneficial for promoting tree species diversity and supporting natural regeneration over time. Lastly, in the third chapter I assess the effect of canopy removal, soil disturbance, and deer browse on the herbaceous layer and explore the applicability of theoretical frameworks to predict diversity-disturbance relationships. The key findings that emerged from this chapter reveal effects of disturbance on diversity are mediated by effects of disturbance on ground-layer productivity, which could be predicted by a unimodal response to canopy openness. Furthermore, deer herbivory is a critical component of the understory disturbance regime and can alter ground-layer responses to disturbance and competition. In the absence of deer, diversity and richness were primarily linked to overstory and ground disturbance, showing either a positive or unimodal response. In the presence of deer, however, increased diversity was associated with higher productivity of the ground layer, indicating greater resilience of browse sensitive plants when resources were more abundant. In addition, it is important to carefully assess changes in diversity as quantitative increases do not necessarily reflect compositional quality as measured by floristic quality indexes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicForest Management and Policy→French-language works237,207→