Intent-Driven Closed-Loop Control and Management Framework for 6G Open RAN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Future mobile networks should provide on-demand services for various industries and applications with the stringent guarantees of Quality of Experience (QoE), which highly challenge the flexibility of network management. However, the diverse requirements of QoE and the management of heterogeneous networks create significant pressure toward communication service providers (CSPs). In the sixth-generation mobile networks, the CSPs should guarantee resilient performance for the communication service consumers with less human involvement. In this work, we turn to Intent-driven network and on-demand slice management, and to decrease the complexity and cost in full life cycle slice management, we first present an intent-driven closedloop (CL) control and management framework that automates the deployment of network slices and manages resources intelligently based on the extended CL architecture. And then, we explore and exploit the deep reinforcement learning algorithm to address the problem of resource allocation, which is formulated as a Markov decision process. Finally, we demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed framework by deploying the open radio access network (RAN) infrastructure in the OpenAirInterface platform and realizing the CL control and management with a near real-time RAN intelligent controller. The emulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of slicing performance, measured in terms of delay and rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".