MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386496278 · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0002355

Incentivizing an exodus: The implications of recruiting nurses from low-middle income countries to high-income countries

2023· article· en· W4386496278 on OpenAlexaffabout
Émilie Bortolussi‐Courval, Natalie Stake-Doucet, Birgit Umaigba

Bibliographic record

VenuePLOS Global Public Health · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Workforce Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversité de MontréalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLow and middle income countriesMiddle incomeHigh income countriesDeveloping countryDemographic economicsEconomicsBusinessLabour economicsEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent months, to palliate against a shortage of nurses, several high-income countries (HICs) have turned to low and middle-income countries (LMICs) to recruit nurses to their healthcare systems, despite the global nursing shortage disproportionately affecting LMICs [1]. This approach is ill-conceived. High-income countries do not have a shortage of registered nurses (RNs); they have a shortage of healthcare institutions providing necessary and sustainable working conditions, leading to a loss of nurses In Canada, the number of vacant RN positions increased from 10,400 to 22,400 (85.8%) from 2019-2021, despite a net growth of 7910 nurses (+2.5%) from 2020-2021 Rather than resorting to recruiting nurses overseas, governments should implement other solutions with documented success: safe nurse-patient ratios and measures to protect nurses from structural and workplace violence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.186
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLOS Global Public HealthSame topicGlobal Health Workforce IssuesFrench-language works237,207