Large-eddy simulation of free-surface turbulent flow in a non-prismatic channel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Hydraulic engineering applications require a good knowledge of turbulent behaviour in non-prismatic channels. This paper aims to predict turbulent behaviour using large-eddy simulation (LES). The model channel has a warped transition. We perform two-phase LES of free-surface flow and validate the results using experimental data and benchmark solution. We discuss rigorous strategies for model set-up, parameter selection and parametric value assignment, including parameters in spectrum synthesiser (SS) and vortex method (VM) for inlet turbulence. The predicted flow displays complex structures due to eddy motions translated from upstream and locally generated by asymmetrical separation in the transition. The history of the flow dynamics may affect the flow development. The predicted velocity, energy spectrum, root-mean-square error, hit-rate and factor-of-two compare well with measurements and benchmark solution. Mapping mean-velocity distribution from experimental data, combined with SS, gives satisfactory inlet condition; alternatively, a 1/7th power-law for the mean-velocity, combined with VM, is acceptable. This paper uses the Okubo–Weiss parameter to delineate instantaneous coherent structures. The LES methods are reliable, efficient and cost-effective. As compared to the simulation of prismatic channels, the flow dynamics in non-prismatic channels exhibit flow separation and turbulence interactions, which increase the flow-complexity, while offering results with crucial practical applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".