Modified Local Linear Estimators in Partially Linear Additive Models with Right-Censored Data Based on Different Censorship Solution Techniques
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper introduces a modified local linear estimator (LLR) for partially linear additive models (PLAM) when the response variable is subject to random right-censoring. In the case of modeling right-censored data, PLAM offers a more flexible and realistic approach to the estimation procedure by involving multiple parametric and nonparametric components. This differs from the widely used partially linear models that feature a univariate nonparametric function. The LLR method is employed to estimate unknown smooth functions using a modified backfitting algorithm, delivering a non-iterative solution for the right-censored PLAM. To address the censorship issue, three approaches are employed: synthetic data transformation (ST), Kaplan-Meier weights (KMW), and the kNN imputation technique (kNNI). Asymptotic properties of the modified backfitting estimators are detailed for both ST and KMW solutions. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods are discussed both theoretically and practically. Comprehensive simulation studies and real-world data examples are conducted to assess the performance of the introduced estimators. The results indicate that LLR performs well with both KMW and kNNI in the majority of scenarios, along with a real data example.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it