MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386500098 · doi:10.5117/9789463728461_ch02

The Excavated Past: Grounded Evidence

2023· book-chapter· en· W4386500098 on OpenAlexaff
Penny Van Esterik

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian Geopolitics and Ethnography
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchaeologyChronologyContext (archaeology)Plateau (mathematics)Interpretation (philosophy)Relation (database)HistoryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" class="first" id="d1561676e108">Chapter 2 of Designs on Pots reviews the archaeological context of Ban Chiang based on recent monographs about the site. The chapter first outlines the history of the discovery and interpretation of the site from the mid-fifties to the present day, followed by summaries of the sequencing and dating of Ban Chiang in relation to other sites on the Khorat plateau from the second millennium BCE to 200 CE. Particular attention is placed on the analysis of metal and ceramic artifacts from the site in relation to the burials. It includes the debates around regional chronology and concludes with some speculations about the infant and young child burials from the site.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.584
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAsian Geopolitics and EthnographyFrench-language works237,207