A fast and accurate colorimetric assay for quantifying hippuric acid in human urine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hippuric acid is an abundant metabolite in human urine. Urinary hippuric acid levels change with toxic exposure to aromatic compounds, consumption of fruits and vegetables, cancers, chronic kidney disease, schizophrenia and Crohn's disease. While urinary hippuric acid can be detected and quantified via mass spectrometry or nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, a colorimetric assay would be preferable for a low-cost, point-of care clinical assay. Two colorimetric methods, that use p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde (DMAB) or benzenesulfonyl chloride (PhSO2Cl), respectively, have been previously developed to detect hippuric acid but these assays have many limitations. We replaced PhSO2Cl with p-toluenesulfonyl chloride (p-TsCl), to create a simpler, faster and more accurate method that works with human urine. This modified colorimetric assay detects from 60 μM to 1000 μM hippuric acid in urine in 2 min. We also corrected for the effects of interfering compounds present in urine such that the assay works across many urine backgrounds. We validated this improved assay on multiple hippurate-spiked urine samples, observing an excellent correlation (R2 > 0.94) between observed and known hippurate concentrations. These data suggest that this colorimetric assay is accurate and should greatly facilitate the measurement of hippuric acid in urine to detect a variety of human conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".