MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4386507341 · doi:10.1101/2023.09.04.556263

Reservoir ecosystems support large pools of fish biomass

2023· preprint· en· W4386507341 on OpenAlexaff
Christine A. Parisek, Francine A. De Castro, Jordan D. Colby, George R. Leidy, Steve Sadro, Andrew L. Rypel

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsStillwater (Canada)
FundersUniversity of California, DavisU.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBiomass (ecology)EcosystemFisheryLimnetic zoneFreshwater ecosystemFreshwater fishFish stockBiodiversityStock (firearms)Environmental scienceGeographyEcologyFishingFish <Actinopterygii>BiologyLittoral zone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Humans increasingly dominate Earth’s natural freshwater ecosystems, and many freshwater fisheries resources are imperiled and at-risk of collapse. Yet despite this, the productive capacity of intensively modified freshwater ecosystems is rarely studied. We digitized, and provide open access to, a legacy database containing empirical fish biomass from 1,127 surveys on 301 USA reservoirs. In parallel, we developed a slate of reservoir classification schemas that were deployed to better understand distributions of biomass and secondary production. By fusing these data products, we generated a predictive capacity for understanding the scope of fisheries biomass and secondary production across all USA reservoirs. We estimate total potential fish total standing stock in USA reservoirs is 3.4 billion (B) kg, and annual secondary production is 4.5 B kg y -1 . In southern USA alone, total standing stock and secondary production are 1.9 B kg and 2.5 B kg y -1 , respectively. We also observe non-linear trends in reservoir fish production and biomass over time, indicating that these ecosystems are quite dynamic. Results demonstrate that reservoirs represent globally relevant pools of freshwater fisheries, in part due to their immense spatial and limnetic footprint. This study further shows that reservoir ecosystems play major roles in food security, and fisheries conservation, even though they are frequently overlooked by freshwater scientists. We encourage additional effort be expended to effectively manage reservoir environments for the good of humanity, biodiversity, and fishery conservation. Significance Statement Globally, many freshwater fishes and fisheries resources are imperiled and at-risk of collapse. However, previous research overwhelmingly focuses on freshwater fisheries in natural rivers and lakes. This study provides evidence that novel and reconciled ecosystems, such as reservoirs, hold massive pools of freshwater fisheries biomass and may have higher ecological value than previously thought. While dams are patently ecological catastrophes, ecosystem services including secondary fish production provided by reservoirs are nonetheless substantial. Indeed, in many locations (e.g., arid regions), reservoirs are the only remaining fisheries resource. We suggest considerable conservation management is warranted for reservoir fisheries worldwide. Data Deposition Code is available on GitHub ( https://github.com/caparisek/res_biomass_USA ; DOI 10.5281/zenodo.8316696). All data and reservoir classifications are available on Zenodo (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.8317007). Furthermore, data will also be deposited in the Environmental Data Initiative repository upon acceptance of this manuscript.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicFish Ecology and Management Studies→French-language works237,207→