MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386511178 · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19954

Hypovitaminosis D, objective oral dryness, and fungal hyphae as three precipitating factors for a subset of secondary burning mouth syndrome

2023· article· en· W4386511178 on OpenAlexaffabout
Samuel N. Baldwin, Carl Canning

Bibliographic record

VenueHeliyon · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSalivary Gland Disorders and Functions
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDrynessHypovitaminosisHyphaBurning mouth syndromeMedicineBiologyMicrobiologyPhysiologyDermatologyImmunologyInternal medicineVitamin D and neurologyvitamin D deficiency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective Elucidating the concurrence and interdependence of three precipitating factors as contributors of a subset of secondary burning mouth syndrome (BMS), which is defined having detectable precipitating factors. Design 47 secondary BMS and 15 non-BMS cases were sourced from medical records of an Oral Pathology Specialty Clinic in Canada (2017–2021). Each case had Cytology, Hematology, and Sialometry tests to detail the state of three precipitating factors (the presence of fungal hyphae, hypovitaminosis D, and objective oral dryness). Three factors were compared between secondary BMS and non-BMS groups independently, in pairs, and as a triple-factor by Fisher's exact tests, Contingency Coefficients, and Logistic Regressions. Results Rates of objective oral dryness (89.36%) and hypovitaminosis D (74.47%) in the secondary BMS group significantly differ from the non-BMS group ( p = 0.0013, p = 0.0016). No difference was found in the incidence of fungal hyphae between BMS (91.49%) and non-BMS groups (p = 0.0881). Rates of three precipitating factors in pairs and as a triple-factor within the secondary BMS group significantly differ from the non-BMS group ( p -values from 0.0011 to <0.0001). Their significant correlations with secondary BMS are found independently (excluding fungal hyphae), in pairs, and as a triple-factor (C-values from 0.371 to 0.461, p -values from 0.002 to <0.001). The highest C-value belongs to the triple-factor. Objective oral dryness ( p = 0.009) and hypovitaminosis D ( p = 0.008) are confirmed as significant predictors for secondary BMS. Conclusions The presence of fungal hyphae contribute to a subset of secondary BMS only when coinciding with objective oral dryness, hypovitaminosis D, or both. This interdependent relationship leads to a hypothesis that hypovitaminosis D, which is commonly called "a low value of vitamin D", and objective oral dryness make an oral environment conducive to insidious Candida invasion, which is an intermediate status of the host-fungal interaction staying between healthy oral mucosa (non-infection) and oral candidiasis (infection).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.518

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeliyonSame topicSalivary Gland Disorders and FunctionsFrench-language works237,207