MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386513057 · doi:10.1515/9781772125399-002

Acknowledgements

2020· book-chapter· en· W4386513057 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Leslie McCartney, Gwich’in Tribal Council

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Press eBooks · 2020
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicOral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LesLie Mccartney and Gwich'in tribaL counciLthe elders' stories as presented in this book would not have been possible without the effort, support, and collaboration of many people over a period of more than twenty years (1999-2020).It's hard to know where to begin, but first and foremost, we thank the twenty-three Elders who generously shared their life stories so future generations can benefit from their wisdom and knowledge.Without their enthusiasm and participation, this book would not have been possible.Mahsi' choo for teaching us so much.We hope future generations will take strength from your stories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.404
Threshold uncertainty score0.851

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4040.234

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta Press eBooksSame topicOral History, Memory, Narrative AnalysisFrench-language works237,207