MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386521333 · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acf19c

EMU Detection of a Large and Low Surface Brightness Galactic SNR G288.8–6.3

2023· article· en· W4386521333 on OpenAlexaff
M. D. Filipović, Shi Dai, Б. Арбутина, N. Hurley‐Walker, Robert Brose, W. Becker, Hidetoshi Sano, D. Urošević, T. H. Jarrett, Andrew Hopkins, R. Z. E. Alsaberi, R. Alsulami, Cristóbal Bordiú, B. Ball, F. Bufano, C. Burger-Scheidlin, E. J. Crawford, Jayanne English, F. Haberl, A. Ingallinera, A. D. Kapińska, Patrick Kavanagh, B. Koribalski, R. Kothes, Sanja Lazarević, Jonathan Mackey, Gavin Rowell, D. A. Leahy, S. Loru, Peter J. Macgregor, L. Nicastro, R. P. Norris, S. Riggi, M. Sasaki, M. Stupar, C. Trigilio, G. Umana, Tessa Vernstrom, Branislav Vukotić

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of ManitobaHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
FundersGovernment of Western AustraliaAustralian GovernmentRussian Academy of SciencesCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationScience and Industry Endowment Fund
KeywordsPhysicsGalactic planeAstrophysicsSurface brightnessAngular diameterSupernova remnantSpectral indexBrightnessAstronomyAngular resolution (graph drawing)Galactic CenterGalaxySupernovaSpectral lineStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present the serendipitous detection of a new Galactic supernova remnant (SNR), G288.8–6.3, using data from the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder (ASKAP) Evolutionary Map of the Universe (EMU) survey. Using multifrequency analysis, we confirm this object as an evolved Galactic SNR at high Galactic latitude with low radio surface brightness and typical SNR spectral index of α = − 0.41 ± 0.12. To determine the magnetic field strength in SNR G288.8–6.3, we present the first derivation of the equipartition formulae for SNRs with spectral indices α > − 0.5. The angular size is 1.°8 × 1.°6 (107.′6 × 98.′4), and we estimate that its intrinsic size is ∼40 pc, which implies a distance of ∼1.3 kpc and a position of ∼140 pc above the Galactic plane. This is one of the largest in angular size and closest Galactic SNRs. Given its low radio surface brightness, we suggest that it is about 13,000 yr old.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207