MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386523033 · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acf132

COOL-LAMPS. Discovery of COOL J0335−1927, a Gravitationally Lensed Quasar at z = 3.27 with an Image Separation of 23.″3

2023· article· en· W4386523033 on OpenAlexfundno aff
K. Napier, Michael D. Gladders, Keren Sharon, Håkon Dahle, Aidan P. Cloonan, Guillaume Mahler, Isaiah Escapa, Josh Garza, Andi Kisare, Natalie Malagon, Simon D. Mork, Kunwanhui Niu, Riley Rosener, Jamar Sullivan, Marie Tagliavia, Marcos Tamargo-Arizmendi, Raul Teixeira, Kabelo Tsiane, Grace Wagner, Yunchong Zhang, M. Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Letters · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratorySmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieStockholms UniversitetTurun YliopistoPlanetary Science DivisionScience Mission DirectorateHáskóli ÍslandsUniversitetet i OsloNational Central UniversitySpace Telescope Science InstituteQueen's UniversityJohns Hopkins UniversityQueen's University BelfastNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationEötvös Loránd TudományegyetemAarhus UniversitetDurham UniversitySmithsonian InstitutionNational Science Foundation
KeywordsQuasarAstrophysicsPhysicsAstronomyGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We report the discovery of COOL J0335−1927, a quasar at z = 3.27 lensed into three images with a maximum separation of 23.″3 by a galaxy cluster at z = 0.4178. To date, this is the highest redshift wide-separation lensed quasar known. In addition, COOL J0335−1927 shows several strong intervening absorbers visible in the spectra of all three quasar images with varying equivalent widths. The quasar also shows mini-broad line absorption. We construct a parametric strong gravitational lens model using ground-based imaging, constrained by the redshift and positions of the quasar images as well as the positions of three other multiply imaged background galaxies. Using our best-fit lens model, we calculate the predicted time delays between the three quasar images to be Δt AB = 499 − 146 + 141 (stat) and Δt AC = − 127 − 17 + 83 (stat) days. Folding in systematic uncertainties, the model-predicted time delays are within the ranges 240 < Δt AB < 700 and −300 < Δt AC < −30. We also present g-band photometry from archival Dark Energy Camera Legacy Survey and Pan-STARRS imaging, and new multi-epoch observations obtained between 2022 September 18 UT and 2023 February 22 UT, which demonstrate significant variability in the quasar and will eventually enable the measurement of the time delay between the three quasar images. The currently available light curves are consistent with the model-predicted time delays. This is the fifth paper from the COOL-LAMPS collaboration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal LettersSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207