MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4386524836 · doi:10.56952/arma-2023-0270

Stress Variation Around the Balarud Lineament in the Zagros Fold and Thrust Belt and its Implication for Reservoir Geomechanics

2023· article· en· W4386524836 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ali Yaghoubi, Maurice B. Dusseault, Yuri Leonenko

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyLineamentSeismologyBoreholeThrust faultDiapirStrike-slip tectonicsTectonicsPetrologyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We investigate horizontal stress variation in the vicinity of the deep-seated Balarud Lineament in the northern part of Iran's Dezful Embayment in the Zagros Fold and Thrust Belt (ZFTB). Both petrophysical data from drilled oil and gas wells (3-4 km deep) and earthquake focal plane solutions (6 to 25 km deep) are used to constrain the orientation and relative magnitudes of the local and regional stresses. The stress orientations in the sedimentary rock strata and the basement are of two entirely distinct types. In the basement, constant regional NE-SW SHmax orientation is observed in the northern ZFTB. The seismologically determined local SHmax direction from 25 focal mechanisms around the Balarud Lineament is 29.3°±8.5°. However, observations of borehole breakouts and tensile-induced fractures indicate that the dominant SHmax orientation is N-S near the Balarud Lineament. The consistent stress direction in the basement indicates a high differential horizontal stress magnitude, whereas the principal stress orientation rotates 35° counter-clockwise in the sedimentary cover where the state of stress is extensional. The Lineament's second-order stress patterns are discussed in terms of wellbore placement and completion decisions. INTRODUCTION Anomalous relative stress magnitudes and orientations have been observed in the world's various uniform lithospheric stress fields. Stress deflection may be observed due to lateral density/strength contrasts, flexural stresses, or superimposed geological structures such as faults (Sonder, 1990) and salt diapirs (Dusseault et al., 2004). In the east-west-trending Transverse Ranges (California), the horizontal stress orientation is different by 25° from the reference stress state in the NW-SE San Andreas fault (Sonder, 1990). The regional NE-SW SHmax is reoriented to N-S in the area overlying the Peace River Arch in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin (Bell & McCallum, 1990). The same phenomenon is reported for the Amazon rift in central Brazil (Zoback & Richardson, 1996) and in the Swiss Alps and the northern Alpines foreland (Kastrup et al., 2004). Stress deflections can also be caused by reservoir depletion (Yale et al., 1994) and by earthquakes (Hauksson, 1994). Hauksson (1994) observed a 15° (±10°) rotation of local stress axes due to the 1992 Mw = 7.3 Landers's earthquake sequence. The scale at which second-order stress patterns occur depends on the degree of lateral density/strength contrasts and the size of geological structures and their orientation relative to regional stress fields (Sonder, 1990; Zoback, 1992).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicearthquake and tectonic studies→French-language works237,207→