Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling Coupled with Hybridization LC–MS/MS for Quantitation of Antisense Oligonucleotides
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Volumetric absorptive microsampling has emerged as a less invasive alternative to venous sampling for small-molecule pharmacokinetic studies, but its application to novel therapeutics such as antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) is not well-established. Results: A workflow was developed using Mitra microsampling coupled with hybridization LC–MS/MS for accurate determination of fomivirsen, a 21-mer ASO, in human blood. Quantitative recovery was achieved regardless of blood hematocrit level or microsample age by implementing impact-assisted extraction. A thorough method evaluation confirmed sensitivity, linearity, precision/accuracy, matrix effect, metabolite interference and four months of microsample stability. Conclusion: The combined impact-assisted extraction and hybridization LC–MS/MS workflow demonstrated the successful quantitation of fomivirsen, establishing the validity and applicability of the approach for ASO drug candidates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it