Laparoscopic Versus Transanal IPAA for Ulcerative Colitis: A Patient-Centered Treatment Trade-Off Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transanal IPAA is a relatively new technique aiming to reduce surgical invasiveness while providing better access to the pelvis in patients with ulcerative colitis. Currently, patients' preference for a surgical approach has never been investigated. OBJECTIVE: To observe patient preference between transanal and laparoscopic IPAA by measuring the potential risk, expressed in pouch function reduction, patients are willing to take to undergo transanal surgery. DESIGN: We conducted standardized interviews of patients using the threshold technique. SETTINGS: Patients from Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto were included. PATIENTS: Fifty-two patients with ulcerative colitis participated in this study. INTERVENTION: Patients with ulcerative colitis, with or without previous pouch surgery, were submitted to standardized interviews using the threshold technique. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured the absolute increase in bowel frequency, bowel urgency, and fecal incontinence that patients would accept if undergoing transanal IPAA. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (mean age: 38.7 ± 15.3 years) with previous surgery and 20 patients (mean age: 39.5 ± 11.9 years) with no previous surgery participated in this study. Patients accepted an absolute increase of 2 bowel movements per day and 1 episode of fecal incontinence per month to undergo transanal IPAA. They also accepted 10 minutes of worsening bowel urgency (ie, decrease of 10 minutes in "holding time") for transanal surgery. Younger patients aged 21 to 29 years only accepted an absolute decrease of 5 minutes in "holding time" ( p = 0.02). LIMITATIONS: Biases inherent to study design. CONCLUSIONS: Patients were willing to accept a potential reduction in pouch function to receive the less invasive method of transanal IPAA. More studies evaluating long-term functional outcomes after transanal IPAA are required to help patients make educated surgical decisions. See Video Abstract. ANASTOMOSIS LAPAROSCPICA VERSUS TRANSANAL ILEALBOLSA ANAL PARA LA COLITIS ULCEROSA UN ESTUDIO DE COMPENSACIN DE TRATAMIENTO CENTRADO EN EL PACIENTE: ANTECEDENTES:La anastomosis anal transanal con reservorio ileal es una técnica relativamente nueva que tiene como objetivo reducir la invasividad quirúrgica y al mismo tiempo proporcionar un mejor acceso a la pelvis en pacientes con colitis ulcerosa. Actualmente, nunca se ha investigado la preferencia de los pacientes sobre el abordaje quirúrgico.OBJETIVO:Observar la preferencia de los pacientes entre la anastomosis ileoanal con reservorio transanal y laparoscópica midiendo el riesgo potencial, expresado en la reducción de la función del reservorio, que los pacientes están dispuestos a someterse a una cirugía transanal.DISEÑO:Realizamos entrevistas estandarizadas de pacientes utilizando la técnica del umbral.AJUSTES:Se incluyeron pacientes del Hospital Mount Sinai en Toronto.PACIENTES:Cincuenta y dos pacientes con colitis ulcerosa participaron en este estudio.INTERVENCIÓN(ES):Los pacientes con colitis ulcerosa, con o sin cirugía previa de reservorio fueron sometidos a entrevistas estandarizadas utilizando la técnica del umbral.MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO PRINCIPALES:Medimos el aumento absoluto en la frecuencia intestinal, la urgencia intestinal y la incontinencia fecal que los pacientes aceptarían si se sometieran a una anastomosis transanal con bolsa ileal.RESULTADOS:Treinta y dos pacientes (edad media: 38,7 ± 15,3) con cirugía previa y 20 pacientes (edad media: 39,5 ± 11,9) sin cirugía previa participaron en este estudio. Los pacientes aceptaron un aumento absoluto de 2 deposiciones por día y un episodio de incontinencia fecal por mes para someterse a una anastomosis transanal ileoanal con reservorio. También aceptaron 10 minutos de empeoramiento de la urgencia intestinal (es decir, disminución de 10 minutos del "tiempo de espera") para la cirugía transanal. Los pacientes más jóvenes de 21 a 29 años solo aceptaron una disminución absoluta de 5 minutos en el "tiempo de espera" ( P = 0,02).LIMITACIONES:Sesgos inherentes al diseño del estudio.CONCLUSIONES:Los pacientes estaban dispuestos a aceptar una reducción potencial en la función del reservorio para recibir el método menos invasivo de anastomosis transanal ileoanal con reservorio. Se requieren más estudios que evalúen los resultados funcionales a largo plazo después de la anastomosis transanal ileoanal con reservorio para ayudar a los pacientes a tomar decisiones quirúrgicas informadas. (Traducción-Yesenia Rojas-Khalil ).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".