MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386541834 · doi:10.29313/bcsurp.v3i2.8724

Model Kelembagaan dalam Pengelolaan Desa Wisata Berbasis Agro-ekowisata dan Budaya di Indonesia

2023· article· en· W4386541834 on OpenAlexaff
Lulik Lulik Fullela Rakhman, Gina Puspitasari Rochman

Bibliographic record

VenueBandung Conference Series Urban & Regional Planning · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLocal Governance and Development
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismEcotourismPolitical scienceBusinessGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. The development of tourism villages is an effort to improve the local economy through its contribution to village revenue. In this case, the role and performance of village institutions determine the success of such development. Institutions play a role in managing resources to achieve development goals. This study aims to identify institutional models of agro-ecotourism and culture-based tourism village management in Indonesia. Unlike previous studies, this study uses a systematic literature review (SLC) approach to the results of related research in Indonesia over the past 10 years (2012-2022). This study found that there are 4 (four) institutional models of agro-ecotourism and culture-based tourism village management in Indonesia, namely: 1) centralized; 2) quadrapel helix; 3) pentahelix; and 4) triplehelix. The four models have similarities that are based on collaboration and partnerships between various actors in the management of tourist villages. The difference lies in the driving institution and the relationship between actors in the management of tourist villages. The success of tourist villages in Indonesia is considered quite successful, namely using the penta helix model.
 Abstrak. Pengembangan desa wisata merupakan upaya untuk meningkatkan perekonomian lokal melalui kontribusinya terhadap pendapatan asli desa. Dalam hal ini, peran dan kinerja kelembagaan desa sangat menentukan keberhasilan pembangunan tersebut. Lembaga berperan mengelola sumber daya untuk mencapai tujuan pembangunan. Studi ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi model kelembagaan pengelolaan desa wisata berbasis agro-ekowisata dan budaya di Indonesia. Berbeda dengan studi sebelumnya, studi ini menggunakan pendekatan systematic literature review (SLC) terhadap hasil – hasil penelitian terkait di Indonesia selama 10 tahun terakhir (2012 – 2022). Studi ini menemukan bahwa terdapat 4 (empat) model kelembagaan pengelolaan desa wisata berbasis agro-ekowisata dan budaya di Indonesia, yaitu: 1) terpusat; 2) quadrapel helix; 3) pentahelix; dan 4) triplehelix. Dari keempat model tersebut, memiliki kesamaan yang berlandaskan pada kolaborasi dan kemitraan antara berbagai aktor dalam pengelolaan desa wisata. Adapun perbedaan terletak pada lembaga penggerak dan hubungan antar aktor dalam pengelolaan desa wisata. Keberhasilan desa wisata di Indonesia yang di anggap cukup berhasil yaitu menggunakan model penta helix.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.404
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBandung Conference Series Urban & Regional PlanningSame topicLocal Governance and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207