Work-Family Balance and Organizational Support for Fathers: An Analysis of Obstacles and Levers in Québec (Canada)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Work-family measures exhibit considerable variation across nations, often intended to foster gender equality. However, a notable research gap emerges, as there is greater emphasis placed on women’s access to work-family balance initiatives, while the situation of men and fathers remains relatively understudied. Given Quebec’s implementation of paternity leave in 2006, our focus shifts toward comprehending measures geared towards aiding fathers in achieving work-family balance. Through an extensive survey involving 1000 fathers, our research question aims to uncover the obstacles hindering fathers’ participation in work-family reconciliation initiatives. Furthermore, it seeks to pinpoint effective strategies and mechanisms for enhancing work-family reconciliation for fathers. Our findings reveal that alleviating or eradicating the adverse effects on fathers’ careers, coupled with improved dissemination of information concerning available work-family measures, would significantly help fathers in fulfilling their family responsibilities. This research thus offers insights into vital pathways to both diminish challenges and increase prospects for fathers in their pursuit of work-family balance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".