Successful surgical retrieval of intestinal foreign body in a Labrador dog: A case report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dogs have indiscriminate feeding habits and often swallow non edible foreign body. A two and half-year-old male Labrador dog was presented to the veterinary clinical complex, Veterinary College and Research Institute Namakkal with a history of anorexia and not voiding faeces. Ultrasonography revealed distended intestinal loops cranial to the hyperechoic shadowing area measuring about 6 cm. Rectal examination revealed an empty rectum. Plain radiography revealed no significant findings. Further contrast radiography study suggested of intestinal stasis. Haemato- Biochemical parameters evaluated were within the normal range. Under general anaesthesia using propofol and maintenance of Isoflurane gas midline celiotomy was performed. Enterotomy was performed and the foreign body socks was removed successfully. Intestine was closed by single layer interrupted suture followed by connel suture pattern. Post operatively animal was treated with antibiotics and analgesic for 5 days and the animal recovered uneventfully.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.011 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".