MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386563069 · doi:10.5376/lgg.2023.14.0002

Genetic Analysis of Backbone Parents of very Early-Mature Spring Soybean in China

2023· article· en· W4386563069 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lijun Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueLegume Genomics and Genetics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoybean genetics and cultivation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaSpring (device)Genetic analysisBiologyGeneticsGeographyGeneEngineeringArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to analyze the molecular genetic characteristics of very early mature backbone parents in the northeastern alpine region, the field phenotype survey, identification of plant diseases and insect pests inoculation and SLAF-seq technology were combined to research genomic genetic characteristics of the very early mature backbone parents and their offspring derived varieties in the high cold region of Heilongjiang Province. The results showed that the genetic distance between Heihe54 and the derived varieties was close; the genetic distance between Heihe54 and Heihe18 was close, with a genetic distance of 0.416, however the genetic distance with Beifeng11 was far, with genetic distance of 0.57; while the genetic distance between Heihe18 and Heihe9 is the closest, with a genetic distance of 0.145. The backbone parents of Heihe54 and their derivatives have the same genomic segment, and the same allelic variation on chromosomes 4 and 9 exceeds 94%. It is believed that the characteristics of the precocious, pointed leaves, lodging resistance, short growth period, oil content, pod habits, germination ability at low temperature, strong adaptability and high yield of the backbone parents in the very early maturity group have become the genetic basis of the backbone parents in the progeny.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.272
Threshold uncertainty score0.238

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLegume Genomics and GeneticsSame topicSoybean genetics and cultivationFrench-language works237,207