MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386564106 · doi:10.29313/bcss.v3i2.7669

Perkiraan Migrasi Perkelompok Umur Provinsi Banten Tahun 2020

2023· article· en· W4386564106 on OpenAlexaff
Ageng Roro Dwi Utamy, Yayat Karyana

Bibliographic record

VenueBandung Conference Series Statistics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Aging
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCensusDemographyGeographyPopulationNet migration rateSocioeconomicsPopulation growthEconomicsSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. In this research, we will calculate the estimated net migration figures for male and female population age groups in the year 2020 for the Province of Banten based on data from the 2020 Population Census. The data analysis technique used is by comparing the Population Growth Rate (PGR) of Indonesia with that of the Province of Banten. By obtaining the difference between the PGR of Indonesia and the PGR of the Province of Banten, we can determine the estimated population change due to migration, or the number of net migrants in the Province of Banten in the year 2020. According to the results of the 2020 Population Census (SP 2020), the PGR of Indonesia is 1.25% per year, while the PGR of the Province of Banten is 1.10% per year, resulting in a difference of -0.15% or -0.015. From the calculations, the estimated number of net migrants in the Province of Banten is -17,875 people. To break down the data into age groups, we use the Age Specific Net Migration Rate (ASNMR) of the Province of Banten based on data from the 2015 Inter-Census Population Survey adjusted to produce negative ASNMR values for the year 2020. This results in the Net Migration Index for males and females, which are -127 and -281 times, respectively. Abstrak. Dalam penelitian ini akan menghitung perkiraan angka migrasi neto perkelompok umur penduduk laki-laki dan penduduk perempuan tahun 2020 Provinsi Banten berdasarkan data hasil Sensus Penduduk tahun 2020. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah dengan membandingkan Laju Pertumbuhan Penduduk (LPP) Indonesia dengan LPP Provinsi Banten. Dengan didapatkannya nilai selisih antara LPP Indonesia dengan LPP Provinsi Banten, dapat diketahui perkiraan perubahan penduduk karena migrasi, atau dapat diketahui jumlah migran neto penduduk Provinsi Banten tahun 2020. Hasil Sensus Penduduk (SP) 2020, LPP Indonesia adalah 1,25 % pertahun sedangkan LPP Provinsi Banten adalah 1,10% pertahun, sehingga ada selisih sebesar -0,15% atau sebesar -0,015. Dari hasil perhitungan didapat perkiraan jumlah migrasi neto penduduk Provinsi Banten adalah -17.875 orang. Untuk memecah menjadi kelompok umur digunakan Age Specific Net Migration Rate (ASNMR) Provinsi Banten berdasarkan data Survei Penduduk Antar Sensus (SUPAS) 2015 yang disesuaikan, sehingga menghasilkan perkiraan nilai ASNMR tahun 2020 bernilai negatif, dan menghasilkan Indeks Migrasi Neto untuk penduduk laki-laki dan perempuan masing-masing adalah -127 dan -281 kali.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBandung Conference Series StatisticsSame topicFood Security and Socioeconomic DynamicsFrench-language works237,207