MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386568769 · doi:10.1101/2023.09.08.556922

Unveiling a Novel Memory Center in Humans: Neurochemical Identification of the <i>Nucleus Incertus</i> , a Key Pontine Locus Implicated in Stress and Neuropathology

2023· preprint· en· W4386568769 on OpenAlexaff
Camila de Ávila, Anna Guguła, Aleksandra Trenk, Anthony J. Intorcia, Crystal Suazo, Jennifer Nolz, Julie Plamondon, Divyanshi Khatri, Lauren Tallant, Alexandre Caron, Anna Błasiak, Geidy E. Serrano, Thomas G. Beach, Andrew L. Gundlach, Diego Mastroeni

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy-related medical research
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
FundersArizona Department of Health ServicesArizona Biomedical Research CommissionBrightFocus FoundationAlzheimer's Association
KeywordsBiologyNeurosciencePonsBasal forebrainNeurodegenerationPathologyHuman brainCentral nervous systemMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The nucleus incertus (NI) was originally described by Streeter in 1903, as a midline region in the floor of the fourth ventricle (4V) of the human brain with an ‘unknown’ function. More than a century later, the neuroanatomy of the NI including its forebrain target regions has been described in lower vertebrates, but not in humans. Therefore, we examined the neurochemical anatomy of the human NI using several markers, including the neuropeptide, relaxin-3 (RLN3), and began to explore the distribution of the NI-related RLN3 innervation of the hippocampus. Methods Histochemical staining of serial, coronal sections (30 µm) of control human postmortem pons was conducted to reveal the presence of the NI by detection of immunoreactivity (IR) for the neuronal marker, microtubule-associated protein-2 (MAP2), two markers present in rat NI, glutamic acid dehydrogenase (GAD)-65/67 and corticotrophin releasing hormone receptor 1 (CRHR1), and RLN3, which is highly expressed in a major population of NI neurons in diverse species. RLN3 and vesicular GABA transporter 1 ( vGAT1 ) mRNA was detected by multiplex, fluorescence in situ hybridization. Postmortem pons sections containing the NI from an Alzheimer’s disease (AD) case were immunostained for phosphorylated-tau (AT8 antibody), to explore potential relevance to neurodegenerative diseases. Lastly, sections of human hippocampus were stained to detect RLN3-IR and somatostatin (SST)-IR, as SST is expressed in interneurons targeted by RLN3 projections in rodents. Results In the dorsal, anterior-medial region of the human pons, neurons containing RLN3– and MAP2-IR, and RLN3/vGAT1 mRNA-positive neurons were observed in an anatomical pattern consistent with that of the NI in other species. GAD65/67– and CRHR1-immunopositive neurons were also detected within this area. Furthermore, RLN3– and AT8-IR were co-localized within NI neurons of an AD subject. Lastly, RLN3-IR was detected in neurons within the CA1, CA2, CA3, and DG areas of the hippocampus, in the absence of RLN3 mRNA. In the DG, RLN3– and SST-IR were co-localized in a small population of neurons. Conclusions Aspects of the anatomy of the human NI are shared across species, including a population of RLN3-expressing neurons and a RLN3 innervation of the hippocampus. Accumulation of phosphorylated-tau in the NI suggests its possible involvement in AD pathology. Further characterization of the neurochemistry of the human NI will increase our understanding of its functional role in health and disease. Graphical Abstract Created with BioRender.com

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicPregnancy-related medical researchFrench-language works237,207