MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Трансформационные процессы в каракалпакском костюме в последней четверти XIX – первой половине XX вв.Transformation Processes in the Karakalpak Costume in the Last Quarter of the 19th – First Half of the 20th Centuries

2023· article· ru· W4386570360 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Z. I. Kurbanova

Bibliographic record

VenueВестник антропологии (Herald of Anthropology) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFashion and Cultural Textiles
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClothingQuarter (Canadian coin)Period (music)MemoirHistoryAncient historyArtArt historyAestheticsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Проживающий на северо‑западе Узбекистана тюркоязычный народ — каракалпаки — обладает своей неповторимой культурой, сохраняющимися на протяжении веков традициями. В некоторой степени это относится и к национальному костюму, который, начиная с последней четверти XIX в. по 1960‑е гг., интенсивно видоизменялся. В статье рассматриваются вопросы, связанные с трансформацией традиционной одежды в указанный период. Изменения прослежены на основе материалов, собранных в ходе этнографических экспедиций, изучения мемуарной литературы. Причиной коренных перемен стало проникновение иноэтничных элементов, а также влияние особенностей советской эпохи, оказавшей воздействие на все сферы жизни населения; определенный отпечаток оставили военные и послевоенные годы. В это время в традиционный костюм были привнесены элементы, коренным образом изменившие не только его внешний вид, но и социальные функции. Новые условия жизни предъявляли к одежде другие требования, соответствующие реальности, — комфортность, свободу движения, простоту исполнения. Это привело к постепенному вытеснению традиционных форм одежды и большему распространению костюма нашего времени. The Turkic‑speaking people living in the north of Uzbekistan — the Karakalpaks — have their own unique culture, traditions that have been preserved for centuries. To some extent, this refers to the national costume, which, from the last quarter of the 19th century to the 1960s, was intensively modified. The article focuses on the transformation of traditional clothes in this period. Changes are traced based on the materials collected during ethnographic expeditions and the study of memoirs. The fundamental changes were caused by the penetration of foreign ethnic elements, the influence of the Soviet era, which affected all spheres of life; a certain imprint was left by the war and the post‑war years. The elements introduced into the traditional costume during this period radically changed not only its appearance, but also its social functions. New living conditions made new demands on clothing that corresponded to reality — comfort, freedom of movement, ease of production. This led to the gradual displacement of traditional forms and the greater spread of the contemporary costume.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueВестник антропологии (Herald of Anthropology)Same topicFashion and Cultural TextilesFrench-language works237,207