Уральские скитники в «чулымской и колыванской тайге» (из истории старообрядчества Томской области в конце XIX – первой трети XX вв.)Ural Skete Dwellers in the “Chulym and Kolyvan Taiga” (From the History of the Old Believers of the Tomsk Region at the End of the 19th — First Third of the 20th Centuries)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Одной из главных задач в изучении такого сложного и противоречивого явления, как русское (и сибирское) старообрядчество является исследование локальных центров разных согласий и толков. По нашему глубочайшему убеждению, лишь такой подход дает возможность воссоздать цельную, объемную картину феномена старообрядчества в России. Статья посвящена реконструкции истории малоизвестного (в наши дни) скитского старообрядческого центра, появившегося в последней четверти XIX в. на территории Томской губернии и просуществовавшего до конца 1930‑х гг. Особое внимание автор уделяет воссозданию биографий скитников и скитниц, большинство из которых были уроженцами Урала и до переселения в Сибирь проживали в различных уральских скитах. Комплексное использование источников, имеющих как сибирское, так и уральское «происхождение», позволило существенно расширить наши представления об этих людях, а в отдельных случаях достаточно полно реконструировать жизненный путь выдающихся старцев и стариц, о судьбе которых до этого момента почти ничего не было известно. Затронуты вопросы, связанные с периодизацией переселенческого движения уральских скитников в Сибирь. Анализируются причины миграции значительно числа старообрядцев в Томскую губернию. Рассказывается о их жизни в новых условиях и проблемах, которые в 1930‑е гг. привели к новому переселению в еще более отдаленные края — на берега Енисея. One of the main tasks in studying such a complex and contradictory phenomenon as Russian (and Siberian) Old Believers is the study of local centers of different consents and interpretations. We firmly believe that only this approach makes it possible to recreate a complete, three‑dimensional “picture” of the phenomenon of Old Believers in Russia. The article is devoted to the reconstruction of the history of the little‑known (nowadays) Old Believers’ skete center, which appeared in the last quarter of the XIX century in the Tomsk province and existed until the end of the 1930s. The author pays special attention to the reconstruction of the biographies of skete dwellers, most of whom were natives of the Urals and lived in various Ural sketes before moving to Siberia. The comprehensive use of sources of both Siberian and Ural origin made it possible to significantly expand our understanding of these people, and in some cases quite fully reconstruct the biographies of prominent elders (starets), about whom little has been known until now. The paper also covers the issues of the periodization of the migration movement of the Ural skete dwellers to Siberia and the reasons for many Old Believers to migrate to the Tomsk province. It describes their life in the new conditions and problems that led to a new migration in the 1930‑s to even more remote lands — to the banks of the Yenisei.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".