MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Evaluating the effectiveness of low-sulphur marine fuel regulations at improving urban ambient PM2.5 air quality: Source apportionment of PM2.5 at Canadian Atlantic and Pacific coast cities with implementation of the North American Emissions Control Area

2023· article· en· W4386583138 on OpenAlexaffabout
Angelos T. Anastasopolos, Philip K. Hopke, Uwayemi M. Sofowote, Dennis Mooibroek, Joyce J.Y. Zhang, Mathieu Rouleau, Hui Peng, Navin Sundar

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Science of The Total Environment · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaMinistry of the Environment, Conservation and ParksHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApportionmentEnvironmental scienceAir quality indexEnvironmental protectionEnvironmental engineeringMeteorologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ambient fine size fraction particulate matter (PM2.5) sources were resolved by positive matrix factorization at two Canadian cities on the Atlantic and Pacific coast over the 2010–2016 period, corresponding to implementation of the North American Emissions Control Area (NA ECA) low-sulphur marine fuel regulations. Source types contributing to local PM2.5 concentrations were: ECA regulation-related (residual oil, anthropogenic sulphate), urban transportation and residential (gasoline, diesel, secondary nitrate, biomass burning, road dust/soil), industry (refinery, Pb-enriched), and largely natural (biogenic sulphate, sea salt). Anthropogenic sources accounted for approximately 80 % of PM2.5 mass over 2010–2016. Anthropogenic and biogenic sources of PM2.5-sulphate were separated and apportioned. Anthropogenic PM2.5-sulphate was approximately 2–3 times higher than biogenic PM2.5-sulphate prior to implementation of the NA ECA low-S marine fuel regulations, decreasing to 1–2 times higher after regulation implementation. Non-marine anthropogenic sources (gasoline, road dust, local industry factors) were shown to together contribute 38 % - 45 % of urban PM2.5. At both coastal cities, the residual oil and anthropogenic sulphate factors clearly reflected the effects of the low-S fuel regulations at reducing primary and secondary sulphur-related PM2.5 emissions. Comparing a pre-regulation and post-regulation period, residual oil combustion PM2.5 decreased by 0.24–0.25 μg/m3 (94%–95 % decrease) in both cities and anthropogenic sulphate PM2.5 decreased by 0.78 μg/m3 in Halifax (47 % decrease) and 0.71 μg/m3 in Burnaby (58 % decrease). Regulation-related PM2.5 across these factors decreased by approximately 1 μg/m3 after regulation implementation, providing a quantified lower estimate of the beneficial influence of the regulations on urban ambient PM2.5 concentrations. Further reductions in coastal city ambient PM2.5 may best consider air quality strategies that include multiple sources, including marine shipping and non-marine anthropogenic source types given this analysis found that marine vessel emissions remain an important source of urban ambient PM2.5.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.284

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Science of The Total Environment→Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols→French-language works237,207→