Evaluation of metagenomic assembly methods for the detection and characterization of antimicrobial resistance determinants and associated mobilizable elements
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) can be transferred between members of a bacterial population by mobile genetic elements (MGE). Understanding the risk of these transfer events is important in monitoring and predicting antimicrobial resistance (AMR), especially in the context of a One Health Continuum. However, there is no universally accepted method for detection of ARGs and MGEs, and especially for determining their linkages. This study used publicly available shotgun metagenomic DNA short-read (Illumina, 100 bp paired-end) sequence data from samples across the One Health Continuum (including beef cattle composite feces from feedlots, catch basin water at feedlots, agricultural soil from feedlot manured surrounding fields, and urban/municipal sewage influent from two municipal wastewater treatment plants) to develop a workflow to identify and associate ARGs and MGEs. ARG- and MGE-based targeted-assemblies with available short-read data were unable to meet this analysis goal. In contrast, de novo assembly of contigs provided enough sequence context to associate ARGs and MGEs, without compromising discovery rate. However, to estimate the relative abundance of these elements, unassembled sequence data must still be used.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".