MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4386591042 · doi:10.26812/bulj.v7i1.543

ELCTION 2016: Is Ted Cruz Eligible to Run for President of the United States?

2015· article· en· W4386591042 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Noah Lourie

Bibliographic record

VenueBrandeis University Law Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresidential systemConstitutionPolitical scienceAmbiguityPower (physics)LawPoliticsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The office of President of the United States is one of the most important positions in the country. The Commander in Chief is in charge of the most powerful military complex, the most affluent nation and must make decisions that will drastically affect the domestic and global community. The power bestowed upon the President and the trust they must earn from the American people, demonstrates the importance that each candidate fulfills the requirements outlined in the Constitution. While most of the conditions necessary for one’s presidential candidature defined in the Constitution are clear, the specific phrase, “natural born citizen,” contains much ambiguity and has continued to be a source of conflict during presidential elections. This ambiguity extends to the current presidential candidate Ted Cruz, who was born in Alberta, Canada in 1970

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0070.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrandeis University Law Journal→Same topicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics→French-language works237,207→