Multimodal fusion for sensorimotor control in steering angle prediction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Efficient reasoning about the spatial and temporal structure of the environment is crucial for perception in autonomous driving , particularly in an end-to-end approach. Although different sensor modalities are employed to capture the complex nature of the environment, they each have their limitations. For example, frame-based RGB cameras are susceptible to variations in illumination conditions . However, these limitations at the sensor level can be addressed by complementing them with sensor fusion techniques, enabling the learning of efficient feature representations for end-to-end autonomous perception. In this study, we address the end-to-end perception problem by fusing a frame-based RGB camera with an event camera to improve the learned representation for predicting lateral control. To achieve this, we propose a convolutional encoder–decoder architecture called DRFuser. DRFuser encodes the features from both sensor modalities and leverages self-attention to fuse the frame-based RGB and event camera features in the encoder part. The decoder component unrolls the learned features to predict lateral control, specifically in the form of a steering angle . We extensively evaluate the proposed method on three datasets: our collected Dataset, Davis Driving dataset, and the EventScape dataset for simulation. The results demonstrate the generalization capability of our method on both real-world and simulated datasets. We observe qualitative and quantitative improvements in the performance of the proposed method for predicting lateral control by incorporating the event camera in fusion with the frame-based RGB camera. Notably, our method outperforms state-of-the-art techniques on the Davis Driving Dataset, achieving a 5.6% improvement in the root mean square error (RMSE) score.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".