Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vollmann’s Rifles, one of the Seven Dreams, is centered around the interaction between Inuits and the Western world, whether at the time of the Franklin expedition or in the contemporary world. The official (hi)story of the Inuit is here challenged, and rewritten with an emphasis on the human, and feminine, side of the events. Vollmann’s women, from Reepah to Lady Jane, are decisive yet changing, images of the ice sheets of the northern American continent.Although Vollmann’s narration is centered around tales of exploration, traditionally masculine, and presents Subzero and Franklin as two major members of a set of triplets, women permeate narration. Instead of naming them all, Vollmann enjoys presenting them as an amorphous group from which a few distinguish themselves: Reepah, Lady Jane Franklin and Sedna. Vollmann turns his female characters into mirrors of the men they interact with, yet the narrator is never able to pierce the mystery behind the mirror, leaving the reader to wonder at Reepah’s thought processin view of some of the conversations that she and Subzero have. The female characters are distinguished more by personality type than by physical aspect, an essential point for the novel. If the relationship Subzero has with Reepah is at times overly and overtly physical, he claims nonetheless to value above all her heart and spirit. In spite of the attempt made by the narrator to approach women indirectly, they remain nonetheless forever out of reach, strangers to him and to his fellow men.Yet if women remain outsiders throughout the narration, they are still at the core of the author’s writing. Vollmann works into The Rifles the trope of women as a territory, to be explored and conquered, just as the North-American continent was virgin territory at the time of Franklin’s expedition. The conquest, both on a personal and a national level, is transcribed in the novel through the use of language, and the discordant note of Reepah’s voice becomes a way for Vollmann to show how badly the Inuits have suffered from their encounter with the Western world. Broken, confused and sometimes incoherent, Reepah becomes a spokesperson for her world, albeit in an almost incomprehensible way. Therefore, her identification to one of the Inuit deities, Sedna, is an ironic twist, confronting the goddess of abundance and the young woman who lacks most of what the Western world might consider to be the bare necessities.Through Reepah, Vollmann manages to polarize the whole narration, thanks to her interaction with both Franklin and Subzero, and her presence in both their worlds. Presented as the link between past and present, between the search for the North-West Passage and Subzero’s foray into the Inuit territory, she is the necessary triplet, the reason that Subzero and Franklin can relate. Yet, through her, the identities of both characters become unfocused and blurred, as if they were intertwined so closely that their idiosyncrasies were merging. Reepah is herself transformed into something either lesser or greater than a person: she becomes not quite human, in turn an animal, a mere presence, a ghost, and a goddess.Vollmann’s depiction of the contemporary Inuit community throughout The Rifles is thus that of a subjugated, lost and almost destroyed people. Through Reepah and her links with both John Franklin and Subzero, the author endeavors to prove how the introduction of repeater rifles into Inuit society wreaked havoc not only with their traditions, but with their ways of life and capacity to survive in the wind-swept and ice-covered lands of the north. Through Reepah and Lady Jane, Vollmann describes his female characters as subdued and battered by life or men (a constant theme throughout his novels to date), yet thanks to Sedna, a figure of resiliency and strength, there remains a note of hope.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".