MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386595768 · doi:10.4000/books.psn.7797

Chapitre VI. L’hybridité générique

2011· book-chapter· fr· W4386595768 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christine Lorre-Johnston

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses Sorbonne Nouvelle eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeReading (process)George (robot)ArtRelation (database)LiteratureHistoryHumanitiesArt historyPhilosophyLinguisticsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vollmann refers to The Rifles as a book that “straddles the gap between fiction and documentary history” (409). The novel’s narrator is difficult to pin down, because of his polymorphous omnipresence and multiple narrative voices. This precludes any attempt to distinguish, within the narration, between fiction and anthropological, historical or travel discourse. This chapter, in conclusion to the other chapters of the book, aims to investigate the generic hybridization of The Rifles and the process of fragmentation of language and genres.The chapter builds on louri Lotman’s idea that in a literary text, by shifting from one system of expression to another, one genre to another, the writer creates “noise” that, paradoxically, is a constant source of information. This strategy plays on the relation between writer and reader, whose reading contract, in The Rifles, is blurred from the beginning and whose expectations are therefore unsettled. The chapter reads The Rifles together with three other texts, in order to examine Vollmann’s way of dealing with dislocation and displacement by employing generic displacement and transformation. Les derniers rois de Thulé (1955, 1989), by Jean Malaurie, is an anthropological narrative about his work with Greenland Inuit; Passage to Juneau (1999), the travel narrative in which Jonathan Raban retraces George Vancouver’s search for the Inside Passage in 1791; and A Discovery of Stangers (1994), a historical novel in which Rudy Wiebe retells John Frankin’s 1820-21 land expedition to the Polar Sea.The conclusion to the anthropological enquiry carried out in Les derniers rois de Thulé consists in denouncing and rejecting the destruction of the Inuit people. The Rifles adopts a similar stance, but conveys it by framing the narrative with testimonies, and by moving away from this form to fiction in the bulk of the text. Further, illustrations have a documentary function in Thulé, whereas they aim at subjective representation in The Rifles. Overall, while Malaurie in Thulé familiarizes himself with the world of the Inuit, one is left with a strong impression of alienation of the protagonist in The Rifles.Passage to Juneau provides a good counterpoint to The Rifles if considered as a travel narrative underlaid by a quest. Raban starts out aiming to examine the various meanings attributed to the Inside Passage over time, and ends up communing with a sea in which he finds a projection of his own tumultuous emotions, in a mix of predominantly Romantic, but also West-Coast Indian vision. By contrast, the quest of Vollmann’s avatars at the Pole is dominated by the painful awareness that their vision is limited by both scope and mortality.A Discovery of Strangers focuses on the story of Greenstockings and Hood during Franklin’s 1820-21 land expedition, a story which is retold in the chapter entitled “Akaicho’s Debt” in The Rifles. Both Wiebe and Vollmann rely on a defamiliarization process, but while the former aims at foregrounding the viewpoint of the Yellowknife Indians and women, the latter evokes the long-term shock caused by the expedition, through time shifts between the 19th and 20th centuries, and via Franklin/Subzero and Reepah’s affair.Altogether, generic hybridity in The Rifles contributes to leaving the reader with an impression of disorientation and repressed guilt, so that any form of reconciliation seems bound to remain a dream. But hybridity is also a source of disruptive “noise” which prevents ethnocentric reduplication by offering so many forms of opening to the Other, leading to a renewed form of Romantic lyricism that refuses closure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0560.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses Sorbonne Nouvelle eBooksSame topicLinguistics and Discourse AnalysisFrench-language works237,207