MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386596680 · doi:10.22371/02.2023.008

Phylogeography of the Pacific Sardine, Sardinops sagax, in the Northeastern Pacific

2023· dissertation· en· W4386596680 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ella S. Adams

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicIdentification and Quantification in Food
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSardinePhylogeographyClupeidaePopulationFisheryBiologyPanmixiaPelagic zoneOceanographyGeographyEcologyGenetic structureGenetic variationDemographyFish <Actinopterygii>PhylogeneticsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Pacific Sardine, (Sardinops sagax), is a small, coastal pelagic species in the family Clupeidae. Sardine are an ecologically important forage fish for many animals, including larger, economically and ecologically important fishes, and have historically supported an important commercial fishery. When the fishery declined in the 1940s, a massive effort in understanding population structure for the Pacific Sardine resulted in a wealth of literature. Initially, these studies agreed on a large panmictic population with high annual variation, but the general consensus has since been that there are multiple subpopulations of the Pacific Sardine along the West Coast of North America. However, there has been no molecular evidence that disparate groups exist within the Pacific Sardine in the Northeastern Pacific. Marine fishes often do not show deep population structure, and regional populations of Sardinops are subject to massive natural population fluctuations which often result in shallow gene lineages. Mitochondrial sequences are known for their rapid mutation rates as compared to nuclear gene sequences, thus are good indicators of population structure over evolutionary time scales. To test if population structure was apparent in Sardines, 434 individuals were examined ranging from Vancouver Island, British Columbia to Bahía Magdalena, Baja California, and a group from the Gulf of California. A 1062 bp fragment of the cytochrome b gene yielded extremely low but significant fixation rates for ɸST. Concordantly low fixation was observed for ɸCT, and was non-significant in all but one instance. These data support the null hypothesis of an absence of genetic structure in the Pacific Sardine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.507
Threshold uncertainty score0.628

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIdentification and Quantification in FoodFrench-language works237,207