Temporal assessment of injury severities of two types of pedestrian-vehicle crashes using unobserved-heterogeneity models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study explores the temporal instability and non-transferability of the determinants affecting injury severities of pedestrians struck by motorcycles and non-motorcycles. Using the pedestrian-vehicle crash data in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, over three years (2017–2019), three possible crash injury severity categories (minor injury, severe injury, and fatal injury) are estimated using alternative models to account for unobserved heterogeneity. These are a random-parameters multinomial logit (RP-ML) model with heterogeneity in means and variances and a latent-class multinomial logit (LC-ML) model with class probability functions. Temporal instability and non-transferability in the effects of explanatory variables are confirmed using a series of likelihood ratio tests based on the two alternative models. Various variables are observed to determine pedestrian-injury severities, and the estimation results show significant temporal instability and non-transferability in both RP-ML and LC-ML models. However, several explanatory variables produce relatively temporally stable and transferable effects, providing valuable insights to implement effective countermeasures from a long-term perspective. Moreover, out-of-sample predictions are simulated to confirm the temporal instability and non-transferability. At the same time, the LC-ML models produce higher differences for temporal instability and lower differences for non-transferability compared to the RP-ML model. Understanding and depth comparing the estimation results, likelihood ratio tests, and out-of-sample predictions using alternative models is a promising direction for future research to explore how the observed and unobserved heterogeneity can be estimated in terms of temporal instability and non-transferability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".