Bibliographic record
Abstract
En août 2011 s’est tenue à Cerisy-la-Salle une décade « Narrations d’un nouveau siècle : romans et récits français, 2001-2010 » dont ce livre constitue les actes. À quoi ressemble une littérature qui accorde la part belle au roman mais sans exclusive générique, dans la concurrence de récits empruntant à tous les genres et de multiples arts ? Une littérature française parce qu’écrite en langue française, mais travaillée de l’intérieur et renvoyée à sa propre étrangeté par les évolutions de cette langue et les porosités multiculturelles que suscitent aujourd’hui des échanges mondialisés ? L’ouvrage rassemble les points de vue d’universitaires européens, canadiens et américains. Il se veut un observatoire critique des évolutions en cours de la littérature et un laboratoire théorique ouvert à différentes approches permettant d’en mesurer les enjeux en temps réel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".