For District VI director: Richard V. Williams
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Washington-Idaho Border Section. University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho. Academic record: University of Leeds, BSc, 1975; University of Cambridge, PhD, 1978. Honors: ACS Fellow, 2012; Royal Society of Chemistry Fellow, 2017. Professional positions (for the past 10 years): University of Idaho, professor, 1997–. Service in ACS national offices: Committee on Publications, 2011–21, 1997–98; Committee on Chemical Abstracts Service, 2003–09. Service in ACS offices: Washington-Idaho Border Section : councilor, 1996–2017, chair, 1992–94, chair-elect, 1993, 1991, National Chemistry Week, local section activities chair, 1993, 1991. Regional meetings : 52nd Northwest Regional Meeting, chair, 1996; 65th Northwest–22nd Rocky Mountain Regional Meeting, organic program chair, 2010; Memphis Section : Executive Committee, 1986–89, Nominating Committee, 1987; National Chemistry Week Local Section Activities, chair; 1987. Member: Member of ACS since 1981. Royal Society of Chemistry. ACS Division : Organic Chemistry. Related activities: Special issue of the Canadian Journal of Chemistry honoring Reg Mitchell, guest editor, 2016; Symposium
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".