The Effect of Etoricoxib in Knee Osteoarthritis and its Impact on Immune Inflammatory Response
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We aim to investigate the value of family rehabilitation training with etoricoxib treatment in knee osteoarthritis and its impact on immune inflammatory response. We selected 100 knee osteoarthritis patients admitted to our hospital from October 2021 to October 2022 and divided them into an experimental group (50 cases) and a control group (50 cases) according to the envelope randomization method. Control group received etoricoxib treatment and experimental group received family rehabilitation training with etoricoxib treatment. Compared the therapeutic effect of both groups, as well as the Western Ontario and McMaster universities osteoarthritis index scale score, Lysholm score, arthritis impact measurement scale score and immunoinflammatory response before and after 3 mo of treatment. The effective aggregate rate of 94.00 % in experimental group after family rehabilitation training with etoricoxib treatment was higher than the effective aggregate rate of 80.00 % in control group after etoricoxib treatment (p<0.05). After 3 mo of treatment, all Western Ontario and McMaster universities osteoarthritis index scale scores and arthritis impact measurement scale scores decreased in both groups and experimental group had lower Western Ontario and McMaster universities osteoarthritis index scale scores and arthritis impact measurement scale scores of joint function, stiffness and pain than control group; Lysholm scores increased in both groups, and experimental group had higher Lysholm scores than control group (p<0.05). After 3 mo of treatment, all immune inflammatory response indicators decreased in both groups, and experimental group had lower interleukin-1, nuclear factor-kappa B and matrix metalloproteinase 3 indicators than control group (p<0.05). In the treatment of knee osteoarthritis disease, family rehabilitation training with etoricoxib has a significant effect, which helps to reduce the level of immune inflammatory response and promote the recovery of their knee joint function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".