Pricing of Averaged Variance, Volatility, Covariance and Correlation Swaps with Semi-Markov Volatilities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we consider the problem of pricing variance, volatility, covariance and correlation swaps for financial markets with semi-Markov volatilities. The paper’s motivation derives from the fact that in many financial markets, the inter-arrival times between book events are not independent or exponentially distributed but instead have an arbitrary distribution, which means they can be accurately modelled using a semi-Markov process. Through the results of the paper, we hope to answer the following question: Is it possible to calculate averaged swap prices for financial markets with semi-Markov volatilities? This question has not been considered in the existing literature, which makes the paper’s results novel and significant, especially when one considers the increasing popularity of derivative securities such as swaps, futures and options written on the volatility index VIX. Within this paper, we model financial markets featuring semi-Markov volatilities and price-averaged variance, volatility, covariance and correlation swaps for these markets. Formulas used for the numerical evaluation of averaged variance, volatility, covariance and correlation swaps with semi-Markov volatilities are presented as well. The formulas that are detailed within the paper are innovative because they provide a new, simplified method to price averaged swaps, which has not been presented in the existing literature. A numerical example involving the pricing of averaged variance, volatility, covariance and correlation swaps in a market with a two-state semi-Markov process is presented, providing a detailed overview of how the model developed in the paper can be used with real-life data. The novelty of the paper lies in the closed-form formulas provided for the pricing of variance, volatility, covariance and correlation swaps with semi-Markov volatilities, as they can be directly applied by derivative practitioners and others in the financial industry to price variance, volatility, covariance and correlation swaps.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".