MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386608500 · doi:10.1080/10618600.2023.2257258

Clustering Sequence Data with Mixture Markov Chains with Covariates Using Multiple Simplex Constrained Optimization Routine (MSiCOR)

2023· article· en· W4386608500 on OpenAlexaff
Priyam Das, Deborshee Sen, Debsurya De, Jue Hou, Zahra S. H. Abad, Nicole Kim, Zongqi Xia, Tianxi Cai

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
KeywordsExpectation–maximization algorithmCluster analysisComputer scienceCovariateContext (archaeology)MaximizationSimplexMarkov chainMixture modelMathematical optimizationData miningArtificial intelligenceMachine learningMathematicsStatisticsMaximum likelihood

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mixture Markov Model (MMM) is a widely used tool to cluster sequences of events coming from a finite state-space. However, the MMM likelihood being multi-modal, the challenge remains in its maximization. Although Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm remains one of the most popular ways to estimate the MMM parameters, however, convergence of EM algorithm is not always guaranteed. Given the computational challenges in maximizing the mixture likelihood on the constrained parameter space, we develop a pattern search-based global optimization technique which can optimize any objective function on a collection of simplexes, which is eventually used to maximize MMM likelihood. This is shown to outperform other related global optimization techniques. In simulation experiments, the proposed method is shown to outperform the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm in the context of MMM estimation performance. The proposed method is applied to cluster Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients based on their treatment sequences of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). We also propose a novel method to cluster people with MS based on DMT prescriptions and associated clinical features (covariates) using MMM with covariates. Based on the analysis, we divided MS patients into three clusters. Further cluster-specific summaries of relevant covariates indicate patient differences among the clusters. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Computational and Graphical StatisticsSame topicBayesian Methods and Mixture ModelsFrench-language works237,207