MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386609104 · doi:10.1109/tie.2023.3310008

Delta-Type Serial Shunt Soft Normally-Open Points With Wide Power Flow Regulation Range in Distributed Network

2023· article· en· W4386609104 on OpenAlexaff
H. Peng, Jianwen Zhang, Jianqiao Zhou, Gang Shi, Jiacheng Wang, Xu Cai

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceTopology (electrical circuits)AlgorithmElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The soft normally-open points (SNOP) have been proposed in response to challenges raised from renewable energy in the grid. Main scheme adopted in SNOP demonstration projects are back-to-back modular multilevel converter (BTB-MMC), which is costly in multifeeder scenarios. The series shunt multiport SNOP (S2-MSNOP) can reduce the cost and volume. But its energy balance faces difficulties under operating conditions where reactive power provided by the cascaded H-bridge of the device is too small, thus impeding its practical implementation. Accordingly, this article presents a novel delta-type serial shunt soft-normally open points (D-S3NOP) scheme, offering a practical multifeeder interconnection solution. D-S3NOP employs an internal circulating current mechanism to achieve energy balance among its constituent parts, thereby expanding the power flow regulation range. First, the topology feature and working principle of D-S3NOP are presented. Subsequently, a suitable control strategy is designed. Comparison of power flow regulation area and cost among S2-MSNOP, D-S3NOP, and BTB-MMC is made after. Finally, a simulation model and an experimental prototype are constructed for verifying the effectiveness of D-S3NOP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial ElectronicsSame topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207