MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Structural evolution of vacancy clusters in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:math>-iron: A kinetic activation-relaxation technique study

2023· article· en· W4386615380 on OpenAlexafffund
M. M. Rahman, Fedwa El‐Mellouhi, Normand Mousseau

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Materials · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFusion materials and technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalRegroupement Québécois sur les Matériaux de Pointe
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaQatar National Research Fund
KeywordsKinetic Monte CarloKinetic energyActivation energyVacancy defectKineticsRelaxation (psychology)Materials scienceDiffusionAtom (system on chip)Lattice (music)Statistical physicsThermodynamicsMonte Carlo methodPhysical chemistryPhysicsCondensed matter physicsChemistryComputer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The kinetics of vacancies in materials plays a significant role in determining their physical properties. In this work, we investigate diffusion of vacancies in $\ensuremath{\alpha}$-iron using the kinetic activation-relaxation technique, an off-lattice kinetic Monte Carlo method with on-the-fly catalog building based on the activation-relaxation technique nouveau coupled with an embedded atom method potential. We focus on the evolution of one to eight vacancies to provide a detailed picture of the energy landscape, overall kinetics, and diffusion mechanisms associated with these defects. We show formation energies, activation barriers for the ground state of all eight systems, and migration barriers for the diffuse systems. This study points to an unsuspected dynamic richness, even for this simple system, that can only be discovered through comprehensive and systematic approaches such as the kinetic activation-relaxation technique. The complex energetic environment controlling the kinetics of small vacancy clusters, we find here, demonstrates that simple rules are not sufficient to develop a robust approach to predictive control and prevention of damage processes associated with vacancy clusters in structural metals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review MaterialsSame topicFusion materials and technologiesFrench-language works237,207