Development and Mechanical Assessment of Corn Flour and Olive Pomace Reinforced Bioplastics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study addresses the pressing need for renewable, biodegradable, and ecologically advantageous materials by harnessing olive-pomace fibers, an often-discarded byproduct of the olive oil extraction process.This investigation underscores the potential of repurposing these waste fibers as reinforcement agents in biocomposite materials.To unleash this potential, olive-pomace fibers were incorporated into a novel matrix composed of cornmeal.The research was spearheaded by the initial characterization of olive-pomace fibers, followed by the formulation and fabrication of biocomposite materials using the fibers in a cornmeal matrix.Subsequently, the mechanical integrity of the biocomposite was rigorously evaluated using Charpy impact tests on standard test specimens.A superior mechanical performance was observed in a specific formulation, labeled as MC40/OP5, which consisted of a 40% cornmeal and glycerol matrix reinforced with 5% olive-pomace fibers.Remarkably, the MC40/OP5 formulation demonstrated a Charpy impact strength of approximately 31.25 KJ/m² .This value surpassed the impact strength of both the MC40 formulation, which consisted of 40% glycerol alone, and the MC40/OP10 formulation, which was reinforced with 10% olivepomace fibers, by factors of 2.1 and 1.3 respectively.The implications of this research are considerable for the evolution of sustainable materials.The successful integration of olive-pomace fibers as reinforcement in biocomposites illuminates a prospective path for agricultural waste utilization to augment material properties.The enhanced mechanical performance of the MC40/OP5 formulation suggests promising avenues in areas requiring elevated impact resistance.In conclusion, this investigation contributes significantly to the ongoing endeavors in developing eco-friendly materials with enhanced mechanical characteristics, thereby bolstering environmental sustainability and resource efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".