MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386623899 · doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c02386

Cesium Oxo-fluoro-aluminates in the CsF–Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> System: Synthesis and Structural Characterization

2023· article· en· W4386623899 on OpenAlexafffund
František Šimko, Aydar Rakhmatullin, Graham King, Mathieu Allix, Catherine Bessada, Zuzana Netriová, Dhiya Krishnan, Michal Korenko

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicInorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)
FundersEuropean Regional Development FundVedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAVAgentúra na Podporu Výskumu a VývojaSlovenská Akadémia ViedCanadian Light Source
KeywordsChemistrySynchrotronPowder diffractionRietveld refinementDiffractionAluminateCaesiumCrystallographyX-ray crystallographyNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyNMR spectra databaseSpectroscopyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Crystal structureSpectral lineStereochemistryInorganic chemistryMaterials scienceMetallurgyOrganic chemistryCement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In an experiment combining various approaches, a precise examination of a portion of the phase diagram of a CsF–Al 2 O 3 system was carried out up to 40 mol% Al 2 O 3 . CsF–Al 2 O 3 solidified mixtures have been investigated using high-field solid-state NMR ( 133 Cs, 27 Al, and 19 F) spectroscopy and X-ray powder diffraction over a broad range of compositions with synchrotron powder diffraction and Rietveld analysis. A new cesium oxo-fluoro-aluminate, Cs 2 Al 2 O 3 F 2, was discovered, prepared, and structurally analyzed by synchrotron diffraction analysis. In addition to Cs 2 Al 2 O 3 F 2, we have synthesized the following pure compounds in order to aid in the interpretation of NMR spectra of the solidified samples: CsAlF 4, Cs 3 AlF 6, and CsAlO 2 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInorganic ChemistrySame topicInorganic Fluorides and Related CompoundsFrench-language works237,207