CO<sub>2</sub> Capture by Diamines in Dry and Humid Conditions: A Theoretical Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work is a mechanistic study of the CO 2 reaction with diamines under both dry and wet conditions. All protic α,ω-diamines R1H1N1-(CH 2 ) n -N2H2R2, with n = 1–5 and R1 and R2 = H and/or CH 3, were investigated. Depending on the nature of the diamine, the reaction was found to follow one of two concerted asynchronous reaction mechanisms with a zwitterion hidden intermediate. Both mechanisms involved two processes. The first process consisted of a nucleophilic attack of the nitrogen N1 of the first amine group on the carbon of CO 2, accompanied by the transfer of a hydrogen atom H1 from N1 to the nitrogen N2 of the second amine group, leading to the formation of a carbamate zwitterion. The subsequent process corresponds to the transfer of a hydrogen atom H2 from the second amine group N2 to an oxygen atom of CO 2, thus ending the reaction by the formation of carbamic acid. The structure of the zwitterion hidden intermediate was determined using the reactive internal reaction coordinates (RIRC), a reaction pathway visualization tool, consisting of a 3D representation of the potential energy versus the internuclear distances N2–H1 and N2–H2, which correspond to the bond being formed and the bond being broken, respectively. The life span of the transitory species, i.e., the zwitterion, was found to depend on the nature of the second amine group. For primary amines, the life span of the zwitterion was “short”, whereas for secondary amines, it was “long”. The corresponding mechanisms were termed the “early” and “late” asynchronous mechanism, respectively. Regardless of the mechanism, the activation barriers were found to decrease with the length of the carbon chain linking the two amine groups, with an asymptotic behavior from n = 4. Involvement of a water molecule generates a significant catalytic effect for diamines with short carbon chains ( n < 4), whereas for longer chain diamines, water has a slightly adverse effect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".