MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386629955 · doi:10.1002/uog.16486

OP33.10: Fetal cerebral blood flow and neonatal brain white matter changes in complex in human fetuses with congenital heart disease

2016· article· en· W4386629955 on OpenAlexaff
Liqun Sun, Brahmdeep S. Saini, Prashob Porayette, Christopher K. Macgowan, John G. Sled, Shi‐Joon Yoo, Lars Grosse‐Wortmann, Edgar Jaeggi, Brian W. McCrindle, John‏ Kingdom, Edward Hickey, Steven P. Miller, Mike Seed

Bibliographic record

VenueUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal and Vascular Pathologies
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai HospitalSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFetusCerebral blood flowHeart diseaseWhite matterDiseaseCardiologyInternal medicinePregnancyMagnetic resonance imagingRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We sought to assess cerebral blood flow supply in fetuses with complex CHD and identify any relationship between cerebral blood flow and white matter changes in CHD fetuses using ultrasound and MRI. We measured the middle cerebral artery (MCA) PI and umbilical artery (UA) with ultrasound, superior vena cava (SVC) flow and fetal brain weight (EBW) with MRI using our previously published technique < span style = "font-size:11px" > </span > in 86 CHD fetuses(mean gestation age 36 week) and 40 normal controls(mean gestation age 36.85 week). Neonatal head ultrasound (HUS) performed after delivery was used to classify the newborn brains as: normal, increased white matter echogenicity (WME), or periventricular leukomalacia (PVL). Fetal hymodynymic parameters and estimate fetal brain weight Z-Score was shown in table 1. Extreme SVC flows defined as SVC flow (2SD above mean: 208 ml/ min/ Kg) or (2 SD below mean: 66 ml/ min/ Kg). 38% of neonates with CHD had increased WME on HUS and 10% had PVL. Elevated SVC flow was associated with a markedly increased risk of PVL (OR: 8.0, p = 0.03). Supporting information can be found in the online version of this abstract Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.565

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUltrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologySame topicRenal and Vascular PathologiesFrench-language works237,207